EEOC v. Market Burgers, L.L.C., d/b/a Checkers, Civil Action No. 13-cv-4651

109.) Second, Dollar General objects to the Magistrate Judge’s finding, in a order, that certain documents submitted by the EEOC for in camera inspection are shielded from disclosure by the deliberative process privilege. First, Dollar General objects to portions of the Magistrate Judge’s Aporder granting the EEOC’s Motion to Compel, which requires Dollar General to provide information regarding its pre-employment testing and to respond to interrogatories that Dollar General claims are in excess of the 25 presumptively allowed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Presently before the Court are two objections by Dollar General to discovery rulings by the Magistrate Judge. On February 3, 2015, the Court referred this matter to the Magistrate Judge for discovery supervision.

The EEOC alleges that Dollar General’s use of criminal background checks has a disparate impact on African-American job applicants. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) brought this suit challenging the use of criminal background checks on potential employees by Defendant Dolgencorp, LLC (“Dollar General”) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Wood MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff U.S. DOLGENCORP, LLC d/b/a DOLLAR GENERAL, Defendant.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. 183 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v.

EEOC v. Market Burgers, L.L.C., d/b/a Checkers, Civil Action No. 13-cv-4651